Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16528 (GAU)

PHANI CHANDRA DAS v. SUNIL DAS AND ANR.

I.A.(Civil)/1129/2026 · 2026-10-12

Susmita Phukan Khaund

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010067092026 2026:GAU-AS:15443 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1129/2026 PHANI CHANDRA DAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARKHATA, MOUZA PUB BAKSA, PS- TAMULPUR, DISTRICT- BAKSA, PIN-781367 VERSUS SUNIL DAS AND ANR. SON OF LATE ROMESH DAS 2:SRI SUBHASH DAS SON OF LATE ROMESH DAS BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARKHATA MOUZA PUB BAKSA PS- TAMULPUR DIST- BAKSA PIN-78136 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K GHOSH, MR. A ROSHID,MS F AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : MS F BEGUM, MR A HOSSAIN,MR. J I BORBHUIYA BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 13.10.2026 Learned counsel Mr. S.K. Ghosh is present for the applicant Phani Chandra Das who has filed this application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act Page No.# 2/2 with prayer for condonation of delay of three days in filing the connected review petition. 2. Ms. F. Begum, learned counsel is present for the respondents and has submitted that she has no objection if the delay is condoned. 3. I have considered the submissions at the Bar. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that the applicant obtained the certified copy of the judgment and he had withdrawn the brief from the earlier engaged counsel. Thereafter, the present engaged counsel took two days’ time in preparing the review petition which resulted in the delay. Sufficient grounds have been shown. No malafide is discernible. Thereby, the prayer for condonation of delay of three days in filing the connected review petition is hereby allowed. 5. The interlocutory application is disposed of. 6. Registry to register the connected review petition and list the same on 05.11.2026. 7. Applicant shall furnish the copy of review petition to the respondents. JUDGE Comparing Assistant