Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16524 (JHR)

SANJAY KUMAR DUBEY v. UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WPC/7769/2025 · 2026-06-15

Rajesh Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. 2026:JHHC:17141-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No. 6812 of 2025 WITH W.P. (T) No. 7769 of 2025 SANJAY KUMAR DUBEY, Son of Sri Ram Suresh Dwivedi, aged about 57 years, resident of M 25 & 26 IVth Phase, Adityapur Industrial Area, Ghamaria, P.O. & P.S. Ghamaria, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand- 832108. ... Petitioner (in both cases) Versus 1. UNION OF INDIA, through the Commissioner of Income Tax, 5-A, Main Road, Central Avenue (Annexe) Building, 4th Floor, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Hindpiri, Town & District- Ranchi (Jharkhand). 2. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, North Block, P.O. New Delhi GPO, P.S. Central Secretariat, New Delhi-110001. 3. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Jamshedpur, having its office at Near XLRI, 47 Circuit House Area, Bistupur, P.O. & P.S. Bistupur, Jamshedpur-831001 (Jharkhand). 4. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Jamshedpur, having its office at Near XLRI, 47 Circuit House Area, Bistupur, P.O. & P.S. Bistupur, Jamshedpur-831001 (Jharkhand). ... Respondents (in both cases) --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioners: Mr Shubham Choudhary, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr Kumar Vaibhav, Sr. S.C. (ITD) Mr Durgesh Agarwal, A.C. to Sr. S.C. Ms Sandamini Gupta, A.C. to Sr. S.C. --------- 03/Dated: 15.06.2026 1. Mr Shubham Choudhary, the learned counsel for the petitioners, based upon the instructions from the petitioners, seeks leave to withdraw both the petitions, since the appellate authorities, in the meanwhile, have already made their orders and the petitioners have challenged such orders before the Tribunal. Neutral Citation No. 2026:JHHC:17141-DB 2. The orders made by the appellate authorities are placed on records. 3. The withdrawal is not opposed by Mr Kumar Vaibhav, the learned counsel for the respondents. 4. Accordingly, leave is granted and these petitions are disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to pursue the proceedings before the Tribunal. 5. Interim applications, if any pending in these petitions, will not survive and are also disposed of. (M. S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) June 15, 2026 N.A.F.R. Manoj/Sharda/Cp.2 Uploaded on 16.06.2026