SMT. ARADHANA SACHIN BAJAJ v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRINCIPAL SECY. REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT AND ORS.
/8130/2026 · 2026-10-08
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16524 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16524 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 105wp8130.2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 8130 OF 2026 (Smt. Aradhana Sachin Bajaj Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors) __________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders __________________________________________________________________________________________ Mr. Anand S. Deshpande, Advocate for petitioner.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR & RAJNISH R. VYAS,JJ. DATE
: 08/10/2026
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. It is his contention that before registering the document, concerned Sub-Registrar is required to make necessary enquiry as contemplated in the Circular dated 12.7.2021 which has not been done.
3. Be that as it may, call can be taken by respndent No. 3 and since the petitoiner has already made representation dated 20.7.2026, we direct respondent No. 3 to decide the representation, expeditiously, in accordance with law.
4. The petition is disposed of.
(RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.) (ANIL S. KILOR, J.) Belkhede Signed by: Mr. R. S. Belkhede Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 08/10/2026 18:59:51