Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16521 (JHR)

BABLU SOREN @ BABLU MAJHI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5283/2026 · 2026-06-15

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:17281] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5283 of 2026 Bablu Soren @ Bablu Majhi, aged about 29 years, Son of Sarat Manjhi, Resident of Village - Lakri, P.O.-Jugilang, P.S. -Nimdih, District-Sariekella Kharsawan. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. H.K.Shirkarwar , Adv. For the State : Mr. Shashi Kr. Verma , Addl.. PP 02 / 15.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Nimdih P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No. 28 of 2026 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 25 of 2026 instituted under Section 103(1), 238, 351(3), 3(5) of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of the common intention with the co- accused persons, has committed murder of Sonu Majhi and caused disappearance of the evidence of murder. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion because of the land dispute with the informant and his family members. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 24.11.2025 , as mentioned in para 7 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandil in connection with Nimdih P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No. 28 of 2026 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 25 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 15.06.2026 Smita/-