- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13576 WP No. 26249 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.26249 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. NINGARAJU B.R. (EX-SERVICEMAN) S/O LATE SRI REVANNA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.94, NGO COLONY, 1ST CROSS, RAJENDRANAGARA (KESARE) NR MOHALLA, MYSURU-570 007. 2. SRI. M P AJITH S/O LATE SRI PRAKASH M R, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.1381, 10TH MAIN, SAHUKAR CHENNAIAH ROAD, JANATHANAGARA, MYSURU-570 009. 3. DR. VARSHA PURANIK D/O. R SRIRAMA KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.209, 7TH CROSS, KERSARE 3RD STAGE, R S NAIDU NAGARA, MYSURU-570 007. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. DHARANI KRISHNA D., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13576 WP No. 26249 of 2025 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MUDA) JHANSI RANI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD, CHAMARAJANAPURA, LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU-570 005 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V., HCGP FOR R.1; SRI. T.P. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R.2.) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONERS' REPRESENTATIONS DATED 11.03.2024, 24.06.2024, 15.10.2024 AND 10.12.2024 (VIDE ANNEXURES-E TO H), AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOT SITES TO THE PETITIONERS IN A TIME-BOUND MANNER, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC NOTICE DATED 12.02.2023 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13576 WP No. 26249 of 2025 ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioners have sought for allotment of sites from respondent no.2 under 'H' category. 2. Learned counsel for respondent no.2/Authority, upon instructions, submits that several similar applications have been received by respondent no.2 and they require at least six months' time to consider those applications and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. He submits that the request of the petitioners will also be considered and appropriate orders will be passed. 3. Hence, the following: ORDER Respondent no.2 is directed to consider the request of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders within a period of six months from today. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 95