Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16517 (RAJ)

AMRAT LAL S/O MOOL CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1751/2026 · 2026-01-30

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4350] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1751/2026 Amrat Lal S/o Mool Chand, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Garu, Police Station Kathumar, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Swati Sharma for Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 30/01/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.11/2026 registered at Police Station Bahtu Kalan (Devi Dholagarh), District Alwar for offence under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He again submits that allegation levelled against the present petitioner is of theft of the buffalo. Though only one case has been reported against the petitioner as criminal antecedent but that case was of the year 1999 and till now no case has been reported against the present petitioner. Petitioner is behind the bars since 09.01.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful [2026:RJ-JP:4350] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1751/2026] purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Amrat Lal S/o Mool Chand, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/194