Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16513 (KAR)

SRI SHIVAMUTHU v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/23731/2025 · 2026-02-10

B M Shyam Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8014 WP No. 23731 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 23731 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SRI SHIVAMUTHU S/O HUCHAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHIKKALAHALLI, RAMANAGAR KARNATAKA-562126. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIDYASAGAR H V., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KEMPARAJU.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT RAMANAGAR-562 159. Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8014 WP No. 23731 of 2025 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHANNAPATANA DIVISION BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-562159. 4. THE POLICE INSPECTOR SATHANURU POLICE STATION KANAKAPURA TALUK BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT- 562126. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.SARITHA KULKARNI., AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ROWDY SHEET OPENED BY THE R-4 AGAINST THE PETITIONER UNDER VIDE ORDER FORM NO. 100 ORDER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8014 WP No. 23731 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved by the fourth respondent's order dated 16.09.2024 [Annexure-D] and the fourth respondent, by this order, has informed the petitioner that in terms of the permission accorded under Paragraph No.1059[5] of the Police Manual [Volume-II], his name is entered in the Register of Rowdies because of the pending proceedings in Crime Nos.209/2014 and 236/2014. 2. The petitioner has placed on record the copies of the Judgments in CC No.375/2014 dated 02.12.2019 and in CC No.1108/2016 dated 24.09.2019 on the file of the I Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kanakapura, to assert that he is acquitted. The outcome in these proceedings are seen and even the fourth respondent has caused a communication with the office of Smt Saritha Kulkarni, the learned Additional Government Advocate which is perused. The petitioner has been - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8014 WP No. 23731 of 2025 acquitted of the offences alleged in both the proceedings and there is no reference to a further proceedings against the petitioner. This court, on a careful consideration of these circumstances, is of the view that there must be appropriate direction to the fourth respondent for removal of the petitioner's name from the Register of Rowdies, but without prejudice to the fourth respondent to take appropriate action if the petitioner's conduct subsequent to this order so justifies. In the light of the afore, the following: ORDER The petition is allowed directing the fourth respondent, once the petitioner files an affidavit of good conduct along with a certified copy of this order, to delete the name of the petitioner from the Register of Rowdies. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE AN/-