IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16454 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-387 Year-2024 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Banka ====================================================== Amit Kumar @ Avinash Kumar Pandit S/o Kailash Pandit R/o Village- Phokhariya, PS- Banka, Distt- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Karuna Kumari W/O Amit Kumar D/O Ramu Pandit R/O Village-Ghutiya, P.O.-Tengra, P.S.-Belhar, District-Banka, Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 11-05-2026 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned APP and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the OP No.2 are present. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the OP No. 2 submits that on 7-4-2026, when petitioner had sought permission to add complainant as OP No. 2 and the permission was granted and thereafter notices were issued on OP No. 2 and based on the notice received, he has appeared. It is next submitted that thereafter the case was fixed for today i.e., 11-5- 2026 at 12:00 PM, but then it is submitted that no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the OP No. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16454 of 2026(3) dt.11-05-2026 2/2 2 further submits that a specific allegation in complaint petition has been alleged that petitioner performed his second marriage with Rajmani Kumari as such it appears that after the complainant has appeared, the petitioner chooses not to appear and contest the case. 5. The case is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sumit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T