BRAHAMDEV TANTI @ ISHNU TANTI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5167/2026 · 2026-06-12
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16503 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16503 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:17093 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5167 of 2026
------ Brahamdev Tanti @ Ishnu Tanti, Aged about 22 years, Son of Bablu Tanti, Resident of Tulsikitta, Post Office –Pathargama, Police Station –Pathargama, District –Godda, State – Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anup Kr. Agarwal, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 12.06.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.41 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed dacoity and looted Rs.4,50,000/- and snatched away the key of the vehicle at gun point. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has not been put on Test Identification Parade as has been mentioned in para -06 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para –21 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.04.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by a coordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 26.05.2026 in B.A. No. 4497 of 2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the
trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Godda, in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.41 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
12.06.2026
Sonu/