$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010353472026 + W.P.(CRL) 2321/2026, CRL.M.A. 23492/2026 VIJAY BANSAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate with petitioner in person versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State with ASI Bhupender Singh, PS: Bhajanpura Advocate (appearance not given) for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 25.08.2026 1. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.106/2025 dated 26.02.2025 registered at PS.: Bhajan Pura, Delhi under Sections 74/79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of statement given by the respondent no.2 on 13.03.2026 before the learned District Judge (Commercial Court) North East District: Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (learned Trial Court) (Annexure P-2), whereby the petitioner and the respondent no.2 have mutually resolved their disputes. 2. Issue notice. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 16:05:36 3. Learned ASC accepts notice and submits that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 also accepts notice and submits that the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed. 5. This Court has further had the occasion of interacting with the petitioners as well as the respondent no.2, who all are present in Court. They affirm the aforesaid statement given by the respondent no.2 before the learned Trial Court on 13.03.2026, whereby the petitioner has already paid the respondent no.2 a total sum of Rs.12,50,000/- as full and final settlement of all her present, past and future claims and as such, the parties have agreed to put a quietus to their disputes. Respondent no.2 hence submits that she does not wish to continue with the aforesaid FIR against the petitioner. 6. The petitioner and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials, as on record, have been duly identified by the IO. 7. As noted above, statement given by the respondent no.2 before learned Trial Court, based on mutual terms between the petitioner and the respondent no.2 is the basis of filing the present petition, which is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) qua the said effect. In view thereof, the present is a fit case for quashing the aforesaid FIR. Accordingly, following the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2014) 6 SCC 466, and also since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 16:05:36 prosecution, continuation of the present FIR will be an exercise in futility. 8. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.106/2025 dated 26.02.2025 registered at PS.: Bhajan Pura, Delhi under Sections 74/79 of the BNS and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. 9. As such, the present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. SAURABH BANERJEE, J AUGUST 25, 2026/So This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 16:05:36