[2026:RJ-JP:4499] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 166/2026 1. Yakub S/o Dinu, Aged About 41 Years, 104 Mauhar Ki Chauhai, Dharmshala Vilaund, Kaman, Dharmshala, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 2. Sabnam D/o Abdul Hnnan, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of 104 Mauhar Ki Chauhai, Dharmshala Vilaund, Kaman, Dharmshala, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Deeg. 4. The Nodal Officer, Kaman. 5. Station House Officer, Police Station Kaithwara, Deeg. 6. The Superintendent Of Police, Nuh Mewat, Hariyana. 7. Mustakim S/o Umerdeen, Resident Of Raniyala, Ps Firozpur Jhirka, Hariyana. 8. Hamid S/o Abul Hnnan, Resident Of Pinagva, Hariyana. 9. Salim S/o Dinu, Resident Of Ghaseda, Police Station Nuh Hariyana. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Saini Mr. Aarif Mohammed & Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.7 to 9 as they [2026:RJ-JP:4499] (2 of 2) [CRLW-166/2026] are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are major and they are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioner No.1 is widow and petitioner No.2 is widower and presently, they are living in a live- in-relationship. In this regard, an agreement dated 18.01.2026 has also been executed between them, which has been annexed with this petition. It is further submitted that petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.5- Station House Officer, Police Station Kaithwara, Deeg and respondent No.5 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /349