Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2026 DAILYLAW 16496 (BOM)
NITIN S/O. CHANDRABHANJI THAKRE AND OTHERS v. SUSHILA W/O. NAGORAO KHADE
SA/488/2022 · 2026-10-08
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16496 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16496 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 sa488.2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.488/2022 Nitin S/o Chandrabhanji Thakre and another ..V/s.. Sushila W/o Nagorao Khade - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. U.M. Aurangabadkar, Counsel for the appellants. Mr. K.P. Sadavarte, Counsel for the respondent.
CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 8.10.2026. As per the mediation report the matter is settled between the parties. The pursis dated 06.10.2026 is also filed on record in this regard.
2. The appellant No.1 is present before the Court and he has states that the appellants have executed the sale deed in favour of the respondent.
3. As the matter is settled, the appeal stands
disposed in terms of compromise deed. A compromise decree be drawn up accordingly.
4. Court fees, if any, be refunded to the appellants as per rules.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) Tambaskar.
Signed by: MR. N.V. TAMBASKAR Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 09/10/2026 10:11:33