Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16495 (CHH)

REENA NETAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/770/2026 · 2026-02-01

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:5867 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 770 of 2026 1 - Reena Netam W/o Savinay Netam Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Mohbhattha Bemetara District- Bemetara (C.G.) 2 - Kavita Sinha W/o Prem Prakash Sinha Aged About 38 Years R/o Near Rajesh Atta Chakki Ram Nagar, Supela Bhilai District- Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioners Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya New Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Health Services Swasthya Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director, Directorate Of Health Services Swasthya Bhawan, Iii Floor Atal Nagar, New Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Mission Director, National Health Services Swasthya Bhawan, Iii Floor Atal Nagar, New Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Chief Medical And Health Officer District- Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 3, 5 & 6/State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Dy. Government Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 02 /02/2026 2 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondents to grant 10 bonus marks to the Petitioners. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the CMHOS (Respondent Nos. 3 & 4) to issue COVID-service experience certificates to the Petitioners immediately. 10.3 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment of staff nurse after adding marks of experience during Covid 19 pandemic in the interest of Justice. 10.4 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be passed in favor of the petitioner. ” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to file better constituted petition. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.02.03 12:02:56 +0530