Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16492 (GAU)

RUPJOUTEY DAS @ RUPJYOTI DAS BHUYAN v. NIRAJ VERMA AND 5 ORS.

Cont.Cas(C)/135/2024 · 2026-10-14

N Unni Krishnan Nair

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010050262024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/135/2024 RUPJOUTEY DAS @ RUPJYOTI DAS BHUYAN W/O SRI KHANINDRA NATH BHUYAN, R/O VILL- DAHATI, P.O. AND DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781301 VERSUS NIRAJ VERMA AND 5 ORS. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:PARTHA PRATIM MAZUMDAR IAS THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM POLITICAL (B) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:ROBI KOTA THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 4:BANDANA BHUYAN THE MEMBER FOREIGNERS TRIBUNAL-II BARPETA DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781301 5:DR. B KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY Page No.# 2/3 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 6:SHRI BISWAJIT PEGU THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM POLITICAL (B) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 7:JAYANT NARLIKAR THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I H SAIKIA, MR. M R CHOUDHURY,MS L HMAR,MR. B BORAH,MR. K KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D NATH, MR A CHALIHA (R-7),MR P NAYAK(R-7),R M BAROOAH(R-7),MR. B GOGOI(R-7),MR. R BORPUJARI(R-7),MR. D SAIKIA(R-7),MR. R BORPUJARI,SR. GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 15.10.2026 Heard Mr. K Kalita, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R Sahiinii, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. D Nath, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 5 & 6 and Mr. A Chaliha, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent No. 7. Mr. K Kalita, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the directions passed before this Court, vide order dated 05.10.2023 in WP(C) No. 7131/2021, has since been complied with by the respondents Page No.# 3/3 and the amounts, due to the petitioner, has been deposited in his bank account. Accordingly, he submits that the directions passed by this Court, having been complied with, the present Contempt Petition may be closed. The said position is also affirmed by the learned Counsel for the respondents. In view of the above submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the directions passed by this Court, vide the order dated 05.10.2023 in WP(C) No. 7131/2021, having been found to have been complied with, the present Contempt Petition stands closed. Notices issued earlier stands recalled. JUDGE Comparing Assistant