[2026:RJ-JP:6495] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1799/2026 Jeetu S/o Bharosi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Nagla Hota, P.S. Sadar, Bayana, District Bharatpur (At Presently Confined In Sub Jail Bayana District Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Poonam Chand Sharma Mr. Ashutosh Mishra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 11/02/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0238/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Bayana, District Bharatpur, for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 118(2), 3(5) and 351(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that other co-accused namely, Sunil S/o Prabhati and Surendra @ Sunna S/o Mangturam have already been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 24.01.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.612/2026. Learned counsel also submits that as per the injury report, the injuries are simple in nature and only one injury is grievous, which is not dangerous to life. Learned counsel further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter; [2026:RJ-JP:6495] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1799/2026] the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; trial will considerably take long time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties, the fact that the injuries are not dangerous to life; charge-sheet has already been filed; trial will considerably take long time in its conclusion; offences are triable by Magistrate and the other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench, thus, without commenting anything on the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and the accused-petitioner, namely Jeetu S/o Bharosi, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH/54