Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:6882] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1671/2026
1. Sheopal S/o Moti Lal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Ward No. 16, Banetha, Tehsil- Uniara, District Tonk (Raj.).
2. Ramavtar S/o Moti Lal, R/o Ward No. 16, Banetha, Tehsil- Uniara, District Tonk (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. District Collector Tonk, Collectorate, Tonk.
3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Uniara, Tehsil Uniara, District Tonk.
4. Tehsildar, Uniara, Tehsil Uniara, District Tonk.
5. Nayab Tehsildar, Banetha, Tehsil Uniara, District Tonk.
6. Superintendent Of Police, District Tonk.
7. Additional S.p., Circle Uniara, Tehsil Uniara, District Tonk.
8. Station House Officer, Police Station Uniara, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Order 12/02/2026 The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners assailing the notice dated 01.10.2025 issued by the respondents under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, in case No.180/2025.
[2026:RJ-JP:6882] (2 of 3) [CW-1671/2026] As the petitioners have directly approached this Court without exhausting the remedies available to them under law, this Court is not inclined to delve into the merits of the matter. Considering the remedy available to the petitioners, this Court is of the opinion that:- (i) The petitioners are required to approach the competent authority by filing reply to the notice dated 01.10.2025 along with any other documents, which they wish to file in support of their reply within a period of ten days from today i.e. 12.02.2026. (ii) The respondents shall consider the reply and take a decision thereon within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of this order, after granting due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order. (iii) The decision taken by the respondents shall be duly served upon the petitioners within a period of three days from the date of passing of such order. (iv) The respondents are restrained from taking any coercive action against the petitioners in pursuance to the notice dated 01.10.2025 and any further action in pursuance to the said decision to be taken by the respondents would be initiated only after a period of ten days from the date of receipt of service of the said decision/order upon the petitioners, enabling them to take appropriate legal remedies, if required.
[2026:RJ-JP:6882] (3 of 3) [CW-1671/2026] Needless to say that the directions issued herein are only to decide the reply/representation as submitted by the petitioners strictly in accordance with law and does not contemplate any decision to be taken in a particular manner. With the above said directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(ANUROOP SINGHI),J DIPESH CHAYAL /113