[2026:RJ-JP:4506] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 602/2026 1. Harkesh Prajapat S/o Bhajan Lal Prajapat, R/o Nimoda, Sapotra, District Karauli (Raj). 2. Rakesh Bairwa S/o Girraj Bairwa, R/o Nimoda, Sapotra, District Karauli (Raj). 3. Vijendra S/o Batti Lal Bairwa, R/o Nimoda, Sapotra, Dis- trict Karauli (Raj). 4. Chandra Prakash S/o Premlal Meena, R/o Nimoda, Sapo- tra, District Karauli (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through P.P. 2. Rajesh Meena S/o Ramniwas Meena, R/o Nimoda, Sapo- tra, District Karauli (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Pandey For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A. Mr. Udit Sapra HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/01/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.231/2025 registered at Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 61(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) & 340(2) of BNS, 2023, on the basis of compromise. 2. Parties are present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. [2026:RJ-JP:4506] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-602/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their property dispute amicably. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the respective parties, the material made available for perusal, especially considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.231/2025 registered at Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli (Rajasthan), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /215