WP No. 10007 of 202 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 10007 of 2024 N.Sekar S/o. Nagaraj, Kedagara Alli Village, Opulinaicken Alli Post, Pappireddy Patty Taluk, Dharmapuri District ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri 2. The District Revenue Officer, Collector, Dharmapuri District 3. The Tahsildar Pappireddy Patty Taluk, Dharmapuri District 4. Ramu S/o.Mathan Kedagara Alli Village, Opuli Naicken Alli Post, Pappireddy Patty Taluk, Dharmapuri District ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to pass appropriate orders to carry out the demarcation of the government land based on the representation given by the petitioner by an application dated 30.03.2022 within the stipulated period prescribed by this Court https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10007 of 202 __________ Page2 of 5 For Petitioner(s): Mrs.M.Gajalakshmi For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Yamuna Devi for R1 to R3 Special Government Pleader No appearance - R4 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to pass appropriate orders to carry out the demarcation of the government land based on the representation given by the petitioner by an application dated 30.03.2022. 2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is the absolute owner of the property in Survey No.211/5 and the petitioner is using the government poramboke water way of Oodai, as the way to reach his property, while so, the 4th respondent herein, who is the owner of the adjoining property, has encroached the said water way Oodai measuring 30 meters breadth and 500 meters length. Therefore, the petitioner submitted various representations from 24.09.2012 to 11.04.2022 on several dates, however, the same has not been considered, hence the present Writ Petition. 3. Heard the learned special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 on the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10007 of 202 __________ Page3 of 5 4. In view of the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, this Court hereby directs the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, viz., by way of an application dated 30.03.2022, on merits and pass appropriate orders, if not already considered, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order, after providing opportunity to the necessary parties With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 03-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssd https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10007 of 202 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The District Collector Dharmapuri District Dharmapuri 2. District Revenue Officer, Collector, Dharmapuri District 3. The Tahsildar Pappareddy Patty Taluk, Dharmapuri District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10007 of 202 __________ Page5 of 5 M.DHANDAPANI, J. ssd WP No. 10007 of 2024 03-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis