RAMJIDEVI ALIAS LONG D/O TEJYA W/O MALKHANSINGH BANJARA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/2063/2026 · 2026-02-09
Anuroop Singhi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16480 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16480 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:5908] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2063/2026 Ramjidevi Alias Long D/o Tejya W/o Malkhansingh Banjara, R/o Shivrampura, Bapi Tehsil Dausa Presently Tehsil Sainthal, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The District Collector, Dausa, District Dausa.
2. Sub-Divisional Officer Dausa, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
3. Tehsildar Dausa, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Chandra Jain with Mr. Kamlesh Choudhary and Mr. Shaitan Choudhary HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Order 09/02/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, has confined his prayer to the extent of seeking directions to be issued to the respondent No.1 – the District Collector, Dausa, District Dausa, to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 12.08.2025 expeditiously, in accordance with law.
2. Taking note of the limited submissions so made, the respondent No.1 is directed to decide the representation dated 12.08.2025 of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to both the parties, within thirty days from the receipt of a certified copy of this order.
3. Accordingly, with the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
[2026:RJ-JP:5908] (2 of 2) [CW-2063/2026]
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
5. Needless to say, this order has been passed only in the context of deciding the petitioner’s representation and in no manner is to be construed as directing the same to be decided in a particular manner.
(ANUROOP SINGHI),J DANISH USMANI /17