Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16480 (KAR)

SRI. L NAGARAJA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/23168/2021 · 2026-02-20

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10595 WP No. 23168 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.23168 OF 2021 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN: SRI. L NAGARAJA S/O LATE LAGUMANAIK AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT MINDAHALLI VILLAGE, BAVANAHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 130. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU -560 001. 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU -560 001. 3. THE TAHSILDAR MALUR TALUK, MALUR – 563 130. Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10595 WP No. 23168 of 2021 4. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER OFFICER KANIZA BHAVAN RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU -560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.P.YOGANNA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING FOR A DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AGAINST THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER REPRESENTATION VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND D AND TO ISSUE SAGUVALI CHIT IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT FROM 53 FILED BY HIM AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.4 TO PAY THE 50 PERCENT OF THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE LAND IN QUESTION AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 13.02.2026, the following order was passed: “This is the 11th time that the matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections. Finally, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections. If the office objections are not complied with, list this matter for dismissal on 20.02.2026.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10595 WP No. 23168 of 2021 2. The matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. Office objections have not been complied with. 3. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE PB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31