JAHANGIR HUSSAIN ANSARI @ SHAHRUKH @ CHUHA BACHCHA @ JAHANGIR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5171/2026 · 2026-06-12
Rajesh Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16479 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16479 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:16959
1 B.A. No. 5171 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5171 of 2026
Jahangir Hussain Ansari @ Shahrukh @ Chuha Bachcha @ Jahangir aged about 21 years, son of Md. Mukhtar Ansari, resident of H. No. 13/B, Jawahar Nagar, P.O. and P.S. Azadnagar, ( Mango), Town Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum
........Petitioner(s)
Vrs. The State of Jharkhand
.......... Opposite Party(s)
….... CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhayay, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Tarun Kumar, A.P.P.
02/12.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P appearing for the State. 2. The applicant who is in custody since 07.10.2025 has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. No. 112 of 2026 arising out of Mango P.S. Case No.250 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 109(1), 308(5), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and under Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-IV at Jamshedpur. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of F.I.R. along with its enclosures have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant earlier the prayer for bail of the applicant has been rejected by this Court vide order dated 10.03.2026 passed in B.A. No. 1384 of 2026. 5. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that now the investigation is complete and charge has been framed on 10.04.2026 and till date not a single witness has been examined. It has further been submitted that applicant has been roped in this case since he was also present at the place of occurrence. It has been submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted bail by the co- ordinate Benches of this Court namely Nayab Hussain @ Tenis has been granted bail in B.A. No. 1725 of 2026 vide order dated 12.03.2026 and Md. Rashid @ Raunak has been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No. 4333 of 2026 vide order dated 09.06.2026. 6. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant. 2026:JHHC:16959
2 B.A. No. 5171 of 2026
7.
Considering the period of custody undergone by the applicant and also the fact that similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. 8. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-IV at Jamshedpur in connection with S.T. No. 112 of 2026 arising out of Mango P.S. Case No.250 of 2025, subject t o condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned trial court which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
12.06.2026 A.Mohanty Uploaded
____/_____/2026