Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16477 (RAJ)

HARLAL THALOR S/O SEWA RAM THALOR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1675/2026 · 2026-01-28

Maneesh Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3731] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1675/2026 1. Harlal Thalor S/o Sewa Ram Thalor, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 130 Mohalla Jatan Khudi Chhoti Teh. Laxmangarh Sikar, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. RJ23GB6274. 2. Kana Ram S/o Madan Lal, R/o Mandir Tejaji Ke Pas Sursura Madanganj Ajmer, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. RJ29GA4721. 3. Subhash Kumar Kulhari S/o Kurdaram, R/o Village Sangasar Ratangarh Churu, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. RJ07GC2670. 4. Bhikha Ram Dudhwal S/o Sharwan Ram, R/o Ward No 04 Nosariya Mangsariya Bikaner, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. RJ07GD2432. 5. Sonaram S/o Danaram Meghwal, R/o Ward No 46 Dariba Bidasar Churu, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. RJ32GC0842. 6. M/s Govind Mines And Minerals, Registered Address- Joshi Oil Mill Amarsar Road Ajeetgarh Sikar, (Rajasthan) Through Proprietor Amit Kumar Pansari S/o Girdhari Lal Agarwal R/o Ward No 08 Opposite Bhati Mension Ki Gali Bajaj Road Sikar, (Rajasthan) Owner Of Vehicles Registration No. RJ23GB7472. 7. M/s Shree Shyam Minerals And Grinding, Registered Address- Dhani New Khoti Dewan Shahpura Jaipur, (Rajasthan) Through Proprietor Sheesh Ram Jat S/o Banwari Lal R/o Village Goudawas Neem Ka Thana Sikar, (Rajasthan) Owner Of Vehicles Registration No. RJ52GB8859 And RJ52GA8859. 8. Manoj Kumar S/o Mangi Lal, R/o Vill. Dadiya Sikar, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. RJ32GB7213. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary. 2. Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of [2026:RJ-JP:3731] (2 of 4) [CW-1675/2026] Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary. 3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Sikar, District Sikar. (Rajasthan). 5. District Transport Officer, DTO Office Kotputali, District Kotputali-Behror. (Rajasthan). 6. District Transport Officer, DTO Office Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu. (Rajasthan). 7. District Transport Officer, DTO Office Shahpura, District Jaipur. (Rajasthan). 8. District Transport Officer, DTO Office Sujangarh, District Churu. (Rajasthan). 9. District Transport Officer, DTO Office Didwana, District Nagaur. (Rajasthan). 10. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Bikaner, District Bikaner. (Rajasthan). 11. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Jaipur, District Jaipur. (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surjeet Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka (AAG) with Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore (AAAG) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 28/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for both the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present matter is squarely covered by the judgments passed by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court [2026:RJ-JP:3731] (3 of 4) [CW-1675/2026] in the matters of Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.1 and Mustak & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.2 2. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned/ possessed by the petitioners were suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the petitioners were not afforded the opportunity of hearing and that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their family. 3. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to the condition that the petitioners will produce their vehicle before the Transport Department, who will examine and inspect the vehicles’ make and design; and in case any mechanical alteration or overloading is found, a detailed inventory shall be prepared and appropriate orders shall be passed strictly in accordance with law. 4. This arrangement shall be valid only for carrying the vehicles to the respective office of DTO for the aforesaid verification/inspection and shall not authorize the vehicle to ply on the road for any other purpose. 5. The petitioners, along with their vehicles concerned, shall report to/ before the respective DTO who passed the order of suspension of registration of the subject vehicles, on 02.02.2026, preferably between 11:00 A.M. to 01:00 P.M. Thereafter, due reply shall be filed within a period of 15 days by the petitioners. 1 S.B. C.W.P. No.9721/2025 2 S.B. C.W.P. No.20073/2025 [2026:RJ-JP:3731] (4 of 4) [CW-1675/2026] 6. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by the competent authority on 17.02.2026. Adjudication of the same shall be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 8. All other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J RAHUL/SOURAV/70