[2026:RJ-JP:4576] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1854/2026 Sahil S/o Azad, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dhulavas, Police Station Kama, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 24/2026 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg for offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 111(2)(a), 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and under Sections 66D and 67a of I.T. Act, 2008. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 4. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner was taken in custody on 04.01.2026, however, he has been shown arrested on 09.01.2026. He also submits that there are guidelines of the Hon'ble Apex Court as regards the installation of the CCTV cameras in the police station. Counsel further submits that the [2026:RJ-JP:4576] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1854/2026] accused-petitioner is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 6. As per the contents of the F.I.R., when a police personnel had a secret information regarding the place from where the present accused-petitioner along with other co-accused were found and from their possession android phones were recovered. On checking of those android phones, which were recovered from the petitioner and other co-accused, some material was found with regard to cyber fraud and extorting money by showing obscene videos of the girls. 7. The investigation of the case is still going on and in the matters of the cyber frauds there are chain of the accused who are connected with each other and in such like matters conclusion of the investigation takes some time. If an accused in such like matters is released on bail during investigation there are ample chances of tempering with the evidence and the investigation. 8. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that investigation of the case is still going on, this Court at his stage is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 9. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed. 10. However, accused-petitioner shall be at liberty to file fresh bail application after completion of the investigation. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /181