Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16475 (JHR)

SHANKAR TIRKEY ALIAS SHANKAR ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./2675/2025 · 2026-06-12

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:17088 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2675 of 2025 ------ Shankar Tirkey @ Shankar Oraon, aged 49 years, S/o Late Bodhan Tirkey @ Bodhan Oraon, R/o Ashok Nagar, Opp. Road No.5, P.O. Doranda, P.S. Argora, District –Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Anthan Tirkey, S/o Paikas Tirkey @ P.R.K. Tirkey, R/o Sarna Toli, Kadru, P.O. –Doranda, P.S. –Argora, District – Ranchi. 3. Baril Kerketta @ Boril Kerketta, S/o Prem Prakash Kerketta, R/o Ashok Nagar, Opp. Road No. 5, P.S. Agrora, P.O. – Doranda, District –Ranchi. .... .... .... Opp. Parties ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Burman, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.03 Dated- 12.06.2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioner for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.2871 of 2024 to its original file. Though notice issued to the opposite party nos. 2 & 3 has been validly served, no one turns up on behalf of the opposite party nos. 2 & 3 in-spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Cr.M.P. No.2871 of 2024 was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order of this Court dated 01.10.2024 whereby the petitioner was directed to file requisites for service of notice upon the opposite party nos. 2 & 3. It is next submitted that the petitioner who is posted in I.T.B.P. Police Force could not take leave from his duty to comply with the said order dated 01.10.2024 within the stipulated time, resulting in dismissal of the same. It is then submitted that the non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 01.10.2024, passed in the said Cr.M.P. No.2871 of 2024 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is next submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.2871 of 2024 and unless Cr.M.P. No.2871 of 2024 is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that Cr.M.P. No.2871 of 2024 be restored to its original file. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No.2871 of 2024 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal. List Cr.M.P. No.2871 of 2024 under the appropriate heading after a week. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 12.06.2026 Sonu-