S RANGASWAMY v. THE CITY (TOWN ) MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER
WP/21165/2024 · 2026-02-10
Suraj Govindaraj
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16472 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16472 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8091 WP No. 21165 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATXAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 21165 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
S RANGASWAMY SON OF LATE SEETHAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT HOUSE NO 417 15TH WARD VAHNIKARA PETE TANK ROAD DODDABALLAPURA TOWN DODDABALLAPURA BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 561 203
2.
SANJEEVANAYAKA D N SON OF LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO 2 15TH WARD VANIKARA PETE TANK ROAD DODDABALLAPURA TOWN DODDABALLAPURA BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 561 203 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GURURAJA S SANGUR., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE CITY (TOWN ) MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER CITY MUNCIPAL COUNCIL DODDABALLAPURA TALUK
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8091 WP No. 21165 of 2024
DODDABALLAPURA BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 561203
2.
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REVENUE DEPARTMENT CITY (TOWN) MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL DODDABALLAPURA LTALUK DODDABALLAPURA BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 561203 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS .K. N.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
ORDER TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS GIVEN TO THE RESPONDENTS / LEGAL NOTICE DATED 05/06/2024 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO AFFECT THE JOINT KHATA OF THE SITE PROPERTY PURCHASED BY THE PETITIONERS AS PER THE REGISTERED SALE DEED DATED 22/07/2022. WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
“i) Issue a writ; in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order to consider the representations given to the respondents/ legal notice dated 5-6-2024 and direct the respondents to affect the joint Khata of the site property purchased by the petitioners as per
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8091 WP No. 21165 of 2024
the registered sale deed dated 22-7-2022. which is at Annexure-A.
ii) Issue any other writ or order or direction that this Hon'ble Court is deems fit in the facts and circumstances in the ends of justice.”
2. The petitioners are stated to have purchased the petition schedule property under a registered sale deed dated 22.07.2022 and subsequently had submitted an application for change of katha, which has not been considered by the respondents. In that background, the petitioners are before this Court seeking for the aforesaid reliefs.
3. Whenever an application for change of katha is made, it is required for the Municipal Authorities to consider the same and pass necessary orders within a reasonable amount of time, either accepting or rejecting the said application, in either case, to be accompanied by reasons.
4. In the present case, the application having been filed on 05.06.2024 has not been considered by the respondents till date.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8091 WP No. 21165 of 2024
5. In that view of the matter, I pass the following:
ORDER i) Writ petition is allowed. ii) Mandamus is directed to the respondents to consider the application dated 05.06.2024 and pass necessary orders within 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. iii) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioners.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
KTY/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14