JAGRAN MAJHI ALIAS JAGRAN MANJHI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./9769/2025 · 2026-02-10
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1647 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1647 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:3558 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9769 of 2025
------ Jagran Majhi @ Jagran Manjhi, S/o Late Ram Manjhi, R/o Lalbazar, PO and PS- Kharsawan, District- Seraikella, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
………..
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
………..
For the Petitioner : Mr. Puja Agarwal, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, APP
------
Order No.4 / Dated : 10.02.2026.
Heard both the sides.
The petitioner, above-named, who is in custody in connection with POCSO Case No.12 of 2025 (arising out of Kharsawan P.S. Case No.41 of 2025) for the offences registered under Sections 75(3), 79, 351(2), 351(3), 115(2), 118(1) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012 has prayed for regular bail.
Informant is the mother of the victim girl who used to be pressurized to have physical relationship with the physical relationship. On refusal he threatened her of dire consequence. When this was confided by the victim girl to her mother, she confronted the petitioner at which she was assaulted by the petitioner resulting into grievous injury.
It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 24.05.2025 and he has no criminal antecedent.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. It is submitted that the petitioner is named in the FIR and there is specific and direct allegation against him.
Considering the gravity of offence and overall facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, is hereby, rejected.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/
Uploaded