Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16468 (RAJ)

SNEHLATA D/O VIDYA PRASAD, W/O RAJVEER v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/151/2026 · 2026-01-28

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3960] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 151/2026 1. Snehlata D/o Vidya Prasad, W/o Rajveer, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bihuri Mithwara, Bara, Banki Fatehpur, Uttar Pradesh, Presently Residing At Kushwah Basti, Dadroni, Dholpur, Rajasthan. 2. Rajveer S/o Dougaram, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Kushwah Basti, Dadroni, Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Dholpur. 4. The SHO, Police Station Sarmathura, District Dholpur. Rajasthan. 5. Vidya Prasad S/o Moolchand, R/o Bihuri Mithwara, Bara, Banki Fatehpur, Uttar Pradesh. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naval Kishore Mali, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent No.5 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent. [2026:RJ-JP:3960] (2 of 2) [CRLW-151/2026] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Sansthan, Lal Kothi, Jaipur on 16.01.2026 and same has been registered in the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam Jaipur on 19.01.2026. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent No.5 is not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondent, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station Sarmathura, District Dholpur (Raj) and respondent No.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/386