Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16467 (AP)

G GANGAIAH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/3615/2026 · 2026-02-08

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010058592026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 3615/2026 Between: 1. G GANGAIAH, S/O. NARASA MANDADI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-98, MAMBEDU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 517589 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI.522239 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TIRUPATHI.517501 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.517501 4. THE TAHSILDAR, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, TIRUAPTHI DISTRICT. 517501 5. B KESAVULU REDDY, S/O. LATE VENKATA REDDY, R/O. D.NO.12- 19, ANUPALLI VILLAGE, RAMCHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, TRUPATHI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH517502 6. B VENKATARAMANA REDDY, S/O. LATE VENKATA REDDY, R/O. D.NO. 12-19, ANUPALLI VILLAGE, RAMCHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, TRUPATHI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.517502 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.3615 of 2026 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the lands up to an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents in Sy.No. 19/11 of Anupalli Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Tirupathi District and in attempting to allot an extent of land form the said lands to third parties at the behest of Respondent Nos.5 and 6 is as per se illegal, irrational, unjust irresponsible, violative of the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of the Art 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners possession and enjoyment of the subject land, except by following due process of law and to restrain the respondents from allotting, assigning or creating any third- party rights in respect of the subject land and to pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the interests of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the lands of the petitioner up to an extent of Ac.l .50 cents in Sy.No.19/11 of Anupalli Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Tirupathi District, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VMR LEGAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.3615 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. The issuance of notices to the respondent Nos.5 and 6 is dispensed with as no prejudice would cause to them even if it is disposed of in their absence. 3. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the lands up to an extent of Ac.1.50 cents in Sy.No.19/11 of Anupalli Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Tirupathi District and in attempting to allot an extent of land from the said lands to the third parties at the behest of the respondent Nos.5 and 6. 4. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 09.02.2026 submits that the petitioner’s father Sri G. Narasa Mandadi was also assigned DKT Patta in Sy.No.19 measuring a total extent of Ac.1.50 cents. After the death of the father of the petitioner, the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the same. The name of the petitioner and his family members have been recorded in the adangal and IB register and entered in the web land records of Anupalle Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal. The 4th respondent has not questioned, disputed, treated the petitioner as unauthorized and not interfered 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.3615 of 2026 with the petitioner’s possession to allot or assign the subject land to the third parties as alleged by the petitioner. 5. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, recording the said instructions of the 4th respondent dated 09.02.2026, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The said instructions shall be made as part of the Court record. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 09.02.2026 PGT