Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16464 (JHR)

RAMESH CHANDRA MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/360/2026 · 2026-06-12

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:17119 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 360 of 2026 Ramesh Chandra Mahto aged about 66 years, son of late Shyam Lal Mahto resident of vill and P.O. Otar, P.S. Seraikella, District-West Singhbhum at Chaibasa … Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Chandan Kumar, Deputy Commissioner, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa cum Chairman District Education Establishment Committee, West Singhbhum, at Chaibasa, P.O. and P.S. Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum 3. Sri Praveen Kumar, District Superintendent of Education, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, P.O. and P.S. Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate : Mr. R.K. Verma, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Nawal Kishore Pandey, Advocate --- 04/12.06.2026 Learned counsel for the parties are present. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that reasoned order has been passed pursuant to the order passed by this court in W.P.(S) No. 3227 of 2020, but the petitioner is not satisfied. He submits that liberty may be reserved to the petitioner to take appropriate step as per law. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party has no serious objection to the prayer made. 4. Considering the submissions, this court is not inclined to proceed further in this contempt proceeding. Accordingly, this contempt proceeding is hereby dropped. 5. However, liberty is reserved with the petitioner to take steps in connection with the reasoned order as may be permissible under law. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 12.06.2026 Uploaded on 15.06.2026 Binit/