- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23152 CRL.RP No. 1442 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1442 OF 2022 BETWEEN: JAYALAKSHAMMANNI D/O LATE K V SIDDARAJE URS, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT D NO.1607, 1st CROSS, EXTENSION, NANJANGUD TOWN 571 301. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B SHARATH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: N VENKATESH S/O LATE G V NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NO. D.NO.2716, 3rd CROSS EXTENSION, R P ROAD, NANJANGUD TOWN - 571 301. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI SYED AKBAR PASHA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI MAHANTESH S HOSMATH, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SENTENCE Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23152 CRL.RP No. 1442 of 2022 DATED 10.01.2022 PASSED IN CASE C.C.NO.908/2016 BY THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., NANJANAGUD AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 23.09.2022 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.34/2022 ON THE FILE OF VII ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION AND ACQUIT THE ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT AND AWARDING COSTS TO THE ACCUSED, THROUGHOUT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER After addressing the arguments for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo. Memo reads as under: "The petitioner undertakes to pay the balance of Rs.2,50,000/- in 4 instalments as mentioned below as per the instructions of petitioner, the undersigned has filed this MEMO. 1. On or before 20th May 2026 Rs.50,000/- 2. - " - 20th June 2026 Rs.50,000/- 3. 20th July 2026 Rs.50,000/- 4. On or before 20th August 2026 Rs.1,00,000/- Total 2,50,000/-" - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23152 CRL.RP No. 1442 of 2022 2. Counsel for respondent has endorsed no objection on the memo. 3. Placing the memo on record, petition stands disposed of. 4. Amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification. 5. It is made clear that if the compensation amount as agreed in the memo is not paid, petitioner shall undergo imprisonment as ordered by Trial Magistrate confirmed by the First Appellate Court. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE DS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15