Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19286 WP No. 10237 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 10237 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. BHOPARAM S/O DOMARA RAMJI.
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.102, G STREET, JOGUPALYA MAIN ROAD, HALASURU, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA - 560008 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHISHEK J.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560001.
2.
GREATER BENGALURU AUTHORITY (GBA) REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER, HUDSON CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560002.
3.
THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER, GBA DOMLUR SUBDIVISION, 12TH FLOOR, P.U.BUILDING, M.G.RAOD, BANGALORE-560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.SPOORTHI.V., HCGP FOR R1 SRI.K.V.BATHE GOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3;)
Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19286 WP No. 10237 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.03.2025 AT ANNEXURE-A BEAIRNG NO.SA.KUM.AA(BOO)KTR/89/209/2024-2025 RESPONDENT REJECTING THE PETITOENR'S APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF KHATA IN RESPECT OF PROPERTY NO.72-1- 3198, HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR, WARD NO.89, JOGUPALYA, BANGALORE AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner has challenged the endorsement issued by respondent No.3, rejecting his request for change of Khata into his name in respect of the property, which is the subject matter of the writ petition.
2. The
learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that, as per Section 149(6) of the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act, 2024, the petitioner is having an alternative and efficacious remedy.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19286 WP No. 10237 of 2025
3. The petitioner is not in a position to contravene the same. Hence, the Writ Petition is hereby dismissed, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority in the manner known to law to redress his grievance.
SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
CH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15