Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16455 (DEL)

MR. AMINUDDIN & ANR. v. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

W.P.(CRL)/1742/2026 · 2026-08-25

Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010250312026 + W.P.(CRL) 1742/2026 MR. AMINUDDIN & ANR ......Petitioners Through: Mr. M. Hasibuddin, Adv. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Amol Sinha, ASC for State. SI Achal PS Jamia Nagar. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 25.08.2026 CRL.M.A. 17525/2026 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 1742/2026 & CRL.M.A. 17524/2026 3. Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking the following prayers: “Issue writ/order/direction thereby quash the FIR No.:113/2026, dated 06.04.2026, u/s 318( 4)/336(3)/316(2)/3(5) BNS, P.S: Jamia Nagar which has been registered in compliance of order dated 17.03.2026 on the application u/s 175(3) BNSS IN CT. Cases No.: 1380/2025 by the Ld. JMFC-08, (South-East District), This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 16:05:58 Saket Court, New Delhi and consequent proceedings arising out of the said FIR in the interest of Justice.” 4. The fundamental’s grievance raised by the petitioners is in respect to the allegations being civil in nature and accordingly, the same has been given a criminal colour. 5. The Investigating Officer through counsel submits that the petitioners has remained non-cooperative and has not furnished any information to the respondents to examine the veracity of the said allegation. 6. In view of the aforesaid, without going into the merits of the matter, the Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioners to approach the IO and to explain the circumstances. 7. Let the IO to carry out the necessary investigation and take it to its logical conclusion. In case no cognizable offence is made out, let the closure report be submitted. 8. If after investigation, IO finds that the cognizable offence is made out and the chargesheet is filed, the petitioners shall be at liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law. 9. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. Pending application also stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J AUGUST 25, 2026 ab This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 16:05:58