Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:17202
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3716 of 2026
Sufiyan Ansari, Son of Safaruddin Ansari … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opp. Party
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Sudhansu Kumar Deo, Advocate
For the Opp. Party
: Ms. Ruby Pandey, Advocate
---
03/15th June 2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 36/2026 for the offence registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of BNS and Section 66B, 66C, 66D, 84C of I.T. Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II- cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 08.03.2026 having no criminal antecedent. He submits that charge-sheet has already been submitted and one mobile phone and one SIM card are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. However, as per paragraph 9 of the counter- affidavit, two victims have been identified, who were defrauded to the tune of Rs. 12,800/- and Rs. 1,000/-. The learned counsel submits that the co-accused, namely, Nasim Ansari has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 3621 of 2026 vide order dated
30.04.2026.
3.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. However, she submits that the case of co-accused, who has been granted bail, is on different footing as there was no recovery from the co-accused.
2026:JHHC:17202
2
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted and that the petitioner is in custody since 08.03.2026 having no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge- II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 36/2026, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Dated: 15.06.2026
Uploaded On:
Mukul/-