Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010184982026 2026:GAU-AS:15608 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4742/2026 SAYED RAIHAN SALIM AHMED S/O SAYED NAZIR UDDIN AHMED, VILL- KATARIHARA, P.O.- KATARIHARA, P.S.- LAKHIPUR, DISTRICT- GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN- 783132 VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, HAVING ITS CENTRAL OFFICE AT STATE BANK OF INDIA BHAVAN, MADAM CAMA ROAD, MUMBAI-400021 2:THE INDIAN CYBER CRIME COORDINATION CENTRE 14C 5TH FLOOR NDCC II BUILDING JAI SINGH ROAD NEW DELHI-110001 3:ZONAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA ZONAL OFFICE BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781006 4:THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA GOALPARA BAZAR BRANCH DISTRICT- GOALPARA Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM- 78310 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ALI, MR. J UDDIN Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR U SARMA(R1,3,4),MR. N BARUA(R1,3,4),MR. K SARMA(C.G.C.) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 14.10.2026 1. Heard Mr. J. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent Bank. 2. The petitioner claims that he has been maintaining a Savings Bank Account No. 30539461387 with the respondent No. 4 Bank. The petitioner’s grievance is that the respondent State Bank of India authorities have kept the said Savings Bank Account blocked entirely on the premise that there has been a disputed transaction credit to the extent of Rs. 2,000/- in the Savings Bank Account of the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that the Savings Bank Account has been blocked without any prior notice to the petitioner. 3. Mr. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent Bank, on instruction submits that the bank account has already been de-frozen and is now being allowed to be operated subject to a lien of Rs. 2,000/-. Page No.# 3/3 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has been able to operate the said bank account. 5. In that view of the matter, in the opinion of this Court, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present case. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant