Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14844 CRP No. 878 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 878 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1.
SMT PARVATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, W/O SRI. M.R. LAKSHMANAPPA
2.
LAKSHMINARAYANSWAMY. M.L AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O SRI. M.R. LAKSHMANAPPA
BOTH R/AT. NO. 130/4, 80 FT., MAIN ROAD, BASAVESHWARA NAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 079. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. YASHWANTHB.N, FOR SRI. C.M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1.
SMT VIJAYALAKSHMI M L AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, D/O SRI. M.R. LAKSHMANAPPA, W/O SRI. D.C. GOWRISHANKAR, R/AT BYRANAIKANAHALLI VILLAGE, DODDABELE HOBLI, BENGALURU - 562 132.
2.
SMT. CHANDRAKALA. M.L.
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14844 CRP No. 878 of 2025
D/O SRI. M.R. LAKSHMANAPPA,
3.
SMT. YASHODHA. M.L.
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, D/O SRI. M.R. LAKSHMANAPPA,
4.
SMT. PRAMILA. M.L.
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, D/O SRI. M.R. LAKSHMANAPPA,
ALL R/AT. NO. 130/4, 80 FT., MAIN ROAD, BASAVESHWARA NAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 079. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH.K.K, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
ORDER DATED 20.09.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO.III IN OS.NO.1502/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AT BENGALURU, REJECTING THE I.A.NO.3 FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 (a) AND (d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo dated 12.03.2026 stating that the plaintiff has withdrawn the suit in O.S.No.150/2024, from which the present Civil Revision Petition arises. In that view of the matter, learned
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14844 CRP No. 878 of 2025
counsel submits that the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
KLY