2026:JHHC:17168 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3640 of 2026 Md. Raja @ Md. Raja Ansari, S/o Md. Manjoor … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Advocate --- 03/15th June 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Pachamba P.S. Case No. 03/2026 for the offence registered under Sections 140(4), 84, 64, 62, 351(2), 351(3) of BNS and cognizance has been taken under Sections 64(1), 62, 84, 140(4) of BNS, now said to have been pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Giridih. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though there is direct allegation against the petitioner, but the victim refused her medical examination and both the petitioner and the victim are major. The learned counsel has further submitted that the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of BNSS also reveals that the victim found herself in train along with the petitioner. He submits that the victim moved with the petitioner from place to place, but never raised any alarm. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19.01.2026 and charge has been framed on 04.06.2026. 3. The learned counsel for the opposite party has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the petitioner has one antecedent under the State Excise Act. The status of the case received from the concerned court reveals that the case has been committed on 07.04.2026 and altogether there are 6 witnesses to be examined. 2026:JHHC:17168 2 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the victim refused medical examination and also the fact that the victim, as per the statement, moved from place to place along with the petitioner and the fact that charge has already been framed, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Giridih in connection with Pachamba P.S. Case No. 03/2026, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 15.06.2026 Uploaded On: Mukul/-