APHC010055262026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 433/2026 Between: 1. KUNDETI VENKATA NARASAIAH, S/O. LATE K.VENKATA SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE (PRIVATE), R/O. D.NO. 1-123, KONDURU VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI V VIJAY RAMA RAJU IAS, THE COMMISSIONEROF SCHOOL EDUCATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA. U.V.SUBBA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KRISHNA, O/O DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KRISHNA, MACHILIPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. KONDA RAVI KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE DEPUTY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, GUDIVADA DIVISION, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the Respondents/Contemnors herein under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1972 for the deliberate and wilful violation of the Order dated 16/04/2024 in W.P.No. 13940 of 2022 granted by 2 this Honble Court and consequently, direct the Respondents to forthwith implement the Order dated 16/04/2024 in W.P.No.13940 of 2022 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M R K CHAKRAVARTHY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Chetan Susheel, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M.R.K. Chakravarthy, learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioner and Sri D. Nava Kiran, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Gurram Ramachandra Rao, learned Counsel for the Respondents. 2. Ld. Counsel for the Respondents has submitted the Written Instructions dated 28.03.2026 furnished by the Joint Director, O/o. Director of School Education, Andhra Pradesh along with Photocopy of the Proceedings of the Additional Joint Secretary to the Director of Government Exam, A.P., dated 24.03.2026. 3. The Proceedings dated 24.03.2026 would indicate that necessary corrections have been made in the school record and in the S.S.C. Certificate of the Petitioner. 4. Sri Chetan Susheel, Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions confirms this position and submits that the Order of this Court has been complied with and no further consideration is necessary. 5. Having so recoded, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 31.03.2026 MNR 4 170 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 433 OF 2026 Dt: 31.03.2026 Mnr