CWP-8134 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Naresh Jain State of Haryana and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Gaurav Gogna, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sukhdeep for respondents No.4 and 5. DEEPAK SIBAL Through the impugned order and 17.02.2026, the petitioner’s work money/security from participating in future tenders been imposed 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with reg the withdrawal imposition of penalty to the petitioner to avail with law, which we permit. 3. So future tenders is concerned, Mr. no specific notice in this regard was issued only to this extent, 8134 of 2026 (O&M) Sr. No.142 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8134 of 2026 Date of Decision : Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Gaurav Gogna, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate, for respondents No.4 and 5. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Through the impugned orders dated 04.02.2026 and 17.02.2026, the petitioner’s work order has been withdrawn; /security deposit has been forfeited; the petitioner has been debarred articipating in future tenders and a penalty imposed upon the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with reg al of the petitioner’s work order; penalty, he be permitted to withdraw this to the petitioner to avail alternate remedies available to him , which we permit. So far as the debarment of the petitioner from participating in future tenders is concerned, Mr. Parmar submits that no specific notice in this regard was issued only to this extent, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 8134 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 30.04.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana. dated 04.02.2026, 21.01.2026 order has been withdrawn; his earnest the petitioner has been debarred penalty @ Rs.7,11,551/- has also Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to order; forfeiture of his deposits and he be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty available to him, in accordance e petitioner from participating in Parmar submits that because prior thereto no specific notice in this regard was issued only to this extent, the impugned VANDANA 2026.05.05 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-8134 of 2026 orders be set aside with liberty to the respondents to proceed afre the petitioner after following the principles of natural justice, which we do order. 5. Accordingly, the impugned order debarring the petitioner from participating in future tenders with liberty to the respondents to proceed afresh this regard, in accordance with law 6. Disposed of. April 30, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable 8134 of 2026 (O&M) be set aside with liberty to the respondents to proceed afre after following the principles of natural justice, which we do Accordingly, the impugned order debarring the petitioner from participating in future tenders with liberty to the respondents to proceed afresh in accordance with law. Disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2026 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No be set aside with liberty to the respondents to proceed afresh against after following the principles of natural justice, which we do Accordingly, the impugned orders only to the extent of debarring the petitioner from participating in future tenders are set aside with liberty to the respondents to proceed afresh against the petitioner, in DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.05.05 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document