Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16439 (MAD)

Tvl.Vikash Stones v. Assistant Commissioner (ST)

WP/11421/2026 · 2026-03-25

C Saravanan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 11421 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN WP No. 11421 of 2026 and WMP Nos.12441 & 12443 of 2026 Tvl.Vikash Stones Rep. by its Partner K.Sivakumar, S. No 47/3, Thaneer Pallam Village, Jagadevipalayam, Thogarapalli Post, Krishnagiri, Tamil nadu-635 203 ..Petitioner(s) Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) Krishnagiri-II Circle, Dharmapuri, Salem, Tamilnadu. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the record relating to the Impugned order in GSTIN: 33AAKFV4417E1ZB (FY 2020-2021) dated 07.07.2023 passed by the Respondent and its Consequential Demand Order dated 10.07.2023 having Reference No. ZD330723031498C issued by the Respondent and Quash the Same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Sanskar Samdaria For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Advocate ORDER Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11421 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent. 3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 07.07.2023, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 28.03.2023 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. However, the Petitioner did not take advantage of the same and has thus suffered the impugned Order dated 07.07.2023. 4. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired long before. However, the present Writ Petition has been filed only on 18.03.2026. 5. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 100% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11421 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 6. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an following endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted hereunder:- “Petitioner is willing to pay 100% from the disputed tax Amount” 7. Recording the above consent given by the Petitioner, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 100% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 28.03.2023 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 07.07.2023 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 28.03.2023. 9. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11421 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 also stand automatically vacated. 10. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 100% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order. 11. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today. 12. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. 13. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 25-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GBI https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11421 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 To Assistant Commissioner (ST) Krishnagiri-II Circle, Dharmapuri, Salem, Tamilnadu. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11421 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 C.SARAVANAN, J. GBI WP No. 11421 of 2026 and WMP Nos.12441 & 12443 of 2026 25-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis