APHC010062172017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2210/2017 Between: 1. BANDARU VEERA MANI PALLAVI, W/O. SRI VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY @ SATHISH, HINDU, AGE 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.6-147, KRISHNA MURTHY STREET, KOTHAPETA - 533 223, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD-500 066. 2. BANDARU VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY SATHISH, S/O. SRI DHARMA RAJU, R/O. D.NO.6-147, KRISHNA MURTHY STREET, KOTHAPETA-533223, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. BANDARU SEETHA MAHALAKSHMI, W/O. LATE SRI DHARMA RAJU, R/O. D.NO.6-147, KRISHNA MURTHY STREET, KOTHAPETA - 533 223, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the calendar and judgment made in C.C.No.485 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kothapeta, dated 31-10-2016 and to set aside the same in so far as the acquittal 2 of the respondents 2 and 3 herein and convict for the charges framed against them. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 1064 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of (22) days in filing the Criminal revision case against the Calendar and Judgment made in C.C.No.485 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kothapeta, dated 31-10-2016 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 7117 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2210 OF 2017 ORDER: 1. Heard Sri N.Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and learned counsel representing Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana, learned counsel for respondent No.2. 2. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner would submit that subsequent to the filing of the revision petition, the husband of the revision petitioner is taking care of the children, and therefore, the petitioner/wife decided not to prosecute the revision. In that view of the matter, the criminal revision case may be dismissed, as not pressed. 3. The submissions of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner are placed on record. 4. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed, as not pressed. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 19.01.2026 Pmk 4 33 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2210 OF 2017 Date: 19.01.2026 Pmk