1 2026:CGHC:5201 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 346 of 2026 1 - Ankit Mishra S/o Ashok Mishra Aged About 37 Years R/o Rajkishore Nagar Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Distt.- Raipur C.G. 2 - The Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, Distt- Bilaspur C.G. 3 - The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. 4 - The Additional Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. 5 - Tehsildar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. 6 - Revenue Inspector Mopka, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. 7 - Smt. Amita Devi W/o Laxmikant Dwivedi R/o Kapil Nagar Sarkanda Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G. 8 - Smt. Manki Devi W/o Laxminarayana Sahu R/o Geetanjali City Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G. 9 - Mahadev Bhattacharya S/o Satyanarayan Bhattacharya R/o Vaishali Nagar, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G. 10 - Mukesh Singh S/o Indranarayan Chandel R/o Rajkishor Nagar Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G. ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS system) For Petitioner For State/Respondents No.1 to 6 : : Mr. Ravindra Sharma, Advocate Mr. Vivek Verma, Govt. Advocate RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.02.02 14:50:10 +0530 2 (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 30/01/2026 1. Heard. 2. This writ petition (civil) has been preferred by petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 Issue an appropriate writ, order, quashing and setting aside the impugned notice dated 26.12.2025 issued by the learned Tahsildar, whereby fresh demarcation has been initiated on the application of the private respondents; 10.2 Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent Authorities to conduct demarcation of land bearing Khasra No 232/26 admeasuring 0.80 acre, strictly in pursuance of the remand order dated 19.05.2025 passed by the learned Additional Collector, and only on the basis of the Petitioner's original application; 10.3 Issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction restraining the Respondent Authorities from entertaining or acting upon any fresh or parallel demarcation application filed by the private respondents in respect of the said land; 10.4 Grant any other relief(s) deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice; 10.5 Award costs of the present petition in favour of the Petitioner.” 3. Pursuant to the query of this Court dated 28.01.2026, learned State counsel submits that notices dated 26.12.2025 (Annexure -P/1 Colly.) have been issued to the respondents No.7 to 10 and one Sangeeta 3 Vasnik for demarcation of their respective lands bearing Khasra Nos. 232/52, 232/48, 232/50, 232/49 and 232/51, respectively, to which, they have filed separate applications. He further submits that the Additional Tehsildar, Bilaspur, has also passed an order dated 08.09.2025 and constituted a team of Patwari and Revenue Inspectors in compliance of the order dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure -P/5) passed by the Additional Collector, Bilaspur. 4. Having considered the aforesaid contention of learned State counsel, and since the aforesaid notices issued to respondents No.7 to 10 pertain to the demarcation of their own lands, and the Additional Tehsildar, Bilaspur has also passed an amended order dated 08.09.2025 in compliance with the order dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure - P/5) passed by the Additional Collector, Bilaspur for demarcation of land of petitioner, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in instant petition. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to respondents No.4 and 5 to demarcate the petitioner’s land bearing Khasra No.232/26 along with demarcation of land of the respondents No.7 to 10, as all the aforesaid lands are adjacent to each other. 5. Learned State counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. Considering the contention of learned counsel for petitioner, the absence of objection from learned State counsel, and further considering the fact that all the aforesaid lands are stated to be adjacent lands, and that as per the Demarcation Rules, demarcation of any land ought to have been done in the presence of owners of adjacent lands, the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner is 4 allowed. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. Respondents No.4 & 5 are directed to get demarcated petitioner’s land bearing Khasra No.232/26, Rakba 0.80 acre, along with the demarcation of lands of respondents No.7 to 10, in accordance with law. 7. Counsel for the petitioner is also directed to file a certified copy of this order before respondents No.4 & 5 for expeditious compliance. 8. With aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. 9. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Rukhsar