Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16430 (KAR)

SRI MUJIB UDDIN BARBHUIYA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/5801/2023 · 2026-02-23

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11788 CRL.P No. 5801 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5801 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUJIB UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O LATE MAHIBUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO. FE-33, 2ND CROSS, SRI. RAMANAGARI, MURUGESHPALYA, BENGALURU-560017. 2. SRI. TAZIMUDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O LATE MAIBUR RAHAMAN BARBHUIYA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO. FE-33, 2ND CROSS, SRI. RAMANAGARI, MURUGESHPALYA, BENGALURU - 560 017. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AMAR CORREA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH SUDDAGUNTEPALYA POLICE STATION, BENGALURU-560035. Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11788 CRL.P No. 5801 of 2023 REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. SRI. HARINDER SINGH S/O PUNJAB SINGH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO. 22174, PRESTIGE FERNS, RESIDENCY APARTMENTS, HARALUR ROAD, OPPOSITE SARJAPUR ROAD, BENGALURU-560102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.N. JAGADEESH, ADDL. SPP FOR SRI. SHASHANK NAGENDRAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C. BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.95/2023 AND COMPLIANT DATED 01.05.2023 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 SUDDAGUNTEPALYA POLICE FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.408,420,34 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BENGLAURU VIDE ANNEXURE A AND B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11788 CRL.P No. 5801 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that during the pendency of the petition, the Police after investigation have filed the final report-charge sheet. 2. In the light of filing of the charge sheet, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and raise a challenge to the charge sheet. 3. Liberty so sought is granted. 4. The petition is disposed as withdrawn. 5. In view of disposal of the petition, pending application does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the same is disposed of. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 247