Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16428 (GAU)

MENEJAR MILI AND 4 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/2118/2026 · 2026-10-12

Anjan Moni Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010188942026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2118/2026 MENEJAR MILI AND 4 ORS. S/O ALIBOR MILI, VILL- KAWAUBHURAKA, P.S.- NORTH LAKHIMPUR, MOUZA- NOWBOICHA, PIN- 787052, DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM. 2: SUNIL MILI S/O TULSIRAM MILI VILL- KAWAUBHURAKA P.S.- NORTH LAKHIMPUR MOUZA- NOWBOICHA PIN- 787052 DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM. 3: MAYNA PAYENG @ MAINA PAYENG @ MOINA PAYENG S/O PADMADHAR PAYENG VILL- KAWAUBHURAKA P.S.- NORTH LAKHIMPUR MOUZA- NOWBOICHA PIN- 787052 DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM. 4: MAHENDRA MILI S/O DIPEN MILI VILL- KAWAUBHURAKA P.S.- NORTH LAKHIMPUR MOUZA- NOWBOICHA PIN- 787052 DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM. 5: RANJITA PAYENG @ RAJITA PAYENG W/O MAYNA PAYENG VILL- KAWAUBHURAKA Page No.# 2/3 P.S.- NORTH LAKHIMPUR MOUZA- NOWBOICHA PIN- 787052 DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S G BARUAH, MS C SAIKIA,MR. B BORGOHAIN,MR. S NEOG Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 13.10.2026 Heard Mr. B. Borgohain, learned counsel for the accused applicant. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for granting pre-arrest bail to the accused applicants namely, 1. Menejar Mili 2. Sunil Mili 3. Mayna Payneg @ Maina Payeng @ Moina Payeng 4. Mahendra Mili and 5. Ranjita Payeng @ Rajita Payeng in connection with North Lakhimpur P.S. Case No. 232/2026, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 665/2026 under Sections 109(1)/117(2)/296/3(5) of the BNS. 3. A Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.09.2026 granted interim pre-arrest bail to the accused applicants. Page No.# 3/3 4. The learned counsel appearing for the accused applicants submits that in terms of the aforesaid order dated 11.09.2026, the accused applicants have already appeared before the Investigating Authority. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that charge-sheet vide CS No.272/2026 dated 17.09.2026 has already been filed. 6. Taking into account the aforesaid offence as alleged in the FIR, this Court is of the opinion that the interim pre-arrest bail dated 11.09.2026 should be made absolute. 7. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of by making the interim pre-arrest bail dated 11.09.2026 absolute. JUDGE Comparing Assistant