Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16423 (JHR)

SHUBHAM KUMAR SAHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4229/2026 · 2026-06-12

Rajesh Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:16951 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4229 of 2026 ---- Shubham Kumar Sahu, aged about 30 years, son of Late Rakesh Sahu, resident of Harijan Basti Near Tube Gate, Burmamines, P.O. & P.S. Burmamaines, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum …. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Pran Pranay, Adv. For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, A.P.P. ---- 02/Dated: 12th June, 2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State. 2. The applicant, who is in custody since 02.09.2025, has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. No.02 of 2026, arising out of Burma Mines P.S. Case No.38 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 132, 121(2), 112, 62, 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, pending in the court of learned A.D.J-VI, at Jamshedpur. 3. The prayer for bail of the applicant was earlier rejected by this Court, vide order dated 19.02.2026, passed in B.A. No.11434 of 2025. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. 5. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that the charge has already been framed on 24.02.2026 and out of six charge-sheet witnesses, two witnesses have already been examined. Although, the applicant has twelve criminal antecedents, but he has been acquitted in four cases and in the remaining cases, he has been bailed out. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been renewed. 6. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 7. Considering the period of custody and the fact that the investigation is complete, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond 2026:JHHC:16951 Page | 2 B.A. No.4229 of 2026 of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J-VI, at Jamshedpur in connection with S.T. No.02 of 2026, arising out of Burma Mines P.S. Case No.38 of 2025, subject to condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned Trial Court which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated 12th June, 2026 Raja/Uploaded on 15.06.2026