APHC010061232009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 4441/2009 Between: 1. SMT. GUMMA LAXMI,, W/O. VENKAIAH, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. CHANDRAJAPALEM VILLAGE, BELLAMKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. EERLA ANJANEYULU,, S/O. VENKAIAH, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. CHANDRAJAPALEM VILLAGE, BELLAMKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SK. IMAMA,, S/O. CHINNA BURAN, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. CHANDRAJAPALEM VILLAGE, BELLAMKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. PARVATHAM CHINNA BIXAPATHY,, S/O. VENKATA RAMAIAH, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. CHANDRAJAPALEM VILLAGE, BELLAMKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. GANDAM SRIRAMULU,, S/O. LAXMI RAM, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. CHANDRAJAPALEM VILLAGE, BELLAMKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. PARVAM RAMULU (DIED) PER L.R.,, SMT. P. SAMRAJYAM, W/O. LATE P. RAMULU, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. CHANDRAJAPALEM VILLAGE, BELLAMKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. MUPPALA SK. SAIDA,, S/O. PEDDA MASTAN, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. CHANDRAJAPALEM VILLAGE, BELLAMKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. P.S.K. MASTAN SHARIF,, S/O. MOULALI, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. CHANDRAJAPALEM VILLAGE, BELLAMKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 9. BATTULA SRINIVAS RAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. CHANDRAJAPALEM VILLAGE, BELLAMKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 10. BATTULA NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. CHANDRAJAPALEM VILLAGE, BELLAMKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPATMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, NEAR ANJANYA SWAMY TEMPLE, KOTHAPET, GUNTUR. 3. THE ASST COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, NEAR ANJANYA SWAMY TEMPLE, KOTHAPET, GUNTUR. 4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRI NAGESHWARA, GOUTHAMESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, BELLAMKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned order of the 4th respondent dated 26-9-2008 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to law and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to register the lands under their occupation of the petitioners in Sy.Nos. 448, 105 and 10 situated at Bellamkonda, Matchayapalem and Chandrajupalli Villages of Bellamkonda Mandal, Guntur District in terms of the auctions held on 16-7-1999 and 24-8-1999 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WVMP 1840 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the inerim order made in WPMPNo. 5822 of 2009 dt. 04.03.2009 in WPNo.4441 of 2009 and dismiss the writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2009(WPMP 5822 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned order of the 4th respondent dated 26- 9-2008 to enable the petitioners under their occupation of the petitioners in Sy.Nos. 448, 105 and 10 situated at Bellamkonda, Matchayapalem and Chandrajupalli Villages of Bellamkonda Mandal, Guntur District, pending disposal of the main writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WVMP 2999 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the inerim orders passed on 04-03-2009 in WPMP No. 5822 of 2009 in WP No.4441 of 2009 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 18132 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased bring on record the proposed petitioners 12 to 16 herein as petitioner Nos. 12 to 16 in the above W.P.No. 4441 of 2009 as legal representative of the deceased 3rd petitioner and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 18133 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased bring on record the proposed 11th petitioner as petitioner No. 11 in the above W.P.No. 4441 of 2009 as legal representative of the deceased 2nd petitioner IA NO: 3 OF 2015(WVMP 165313 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP 4399 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dismiss the petition in view of the facts and circumstances by vacate the interim orders dated: 04-03-2009 made in WP. MP. No. 5822/2009 in WP. No. 4441/2009 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SHAIK JAVVAD UR RAHAMAN 2. J KANAKAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS 3. DEVI SUBHASHINI ANNE SC For Endowments The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITON NO.4441 OF 2009 ORDER: No representation on behalf of the petitioner(s). Heard learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the docket order reveals that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last three occasions i.e., on 02.12.2025, 09.12.2025 and 23.01.2026. Therefore, on 23.01.2026, the matter is directed to be listed on 27.01.2026 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents submits that even on merits, the present writ petition is filed challenging the public auction notice dated 26.11.2008. It is further submitted that since the matter pertains to the year 2008, the cause does not survive for further adjudication. Hence, no further orders are necessary and the matter becomes infructuous. 4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 27.01.2026 BSP 36 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.4441 of 2009 27.01.2026 BSP