APHC010057912026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3524/2026 Between: 1. GADDAM RAZORIA, W/O. GADDAM PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC RETIRED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO.25-1667, PODALAKUR ROAD, PRAGATHI NAGAR COLONY, GAUTHAM NAGAR, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522237. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE-524001. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BUCHIREDDYPALEM POLICE STATION, NELLORE DISTRICT-524305 4. JOINT COLLECTOR, COLLECTOR OFFICER, NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE-524001. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, BUCHIREDDYPALEM, NELLORE DISTRICT- 524305. 6. GADDAM SIRISHA, , D/O. PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC STAFF NURSE, R/O. HARIZANAWADA, BUCHIREDDYPALEM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT-524305. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief: “…to issue Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No.3 and. 5 in interfering with the Civil disputes between the Petitioner and unofficial Respondent and thereby threatening the Petitioner to enter into her lands to the extent of Ac. 1.15 Cents in Sy. No.1115/2, Sy.No.1112/14 and Sy.No.1110/5 of Vavveru Village, Buchireddypalem Mandal, Nellore District, is illegal, arbitrary, high-handed and a violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 and their staff not to interfere with the civil disputes in between the Petitioner and unofficial Respondent…” 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader. 2. Sri Harinath Reddy Soma, learned counsel for the Petitioner, submits that Respondent Nos.3 and 5 have been unnecessarily interfering in the civil dispute between the Petitioner and unofficial Respondent No.6. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that Respondent No.6 filed a grievance on 05.01.2026 regarding a land dispute with the Petitioner. The learned Civil Judge, Kovur, had already granted a permanent injunction in O.S.No.110 of 2017 on 20.10.2022 in favour of Respondent No.6. Execution proceedings (E.P.No.9 of 2024) are pending to enforce the decree. On 19.01.2026, the Petitioner’s 3 grandson was informed by Respondent No.3 at the police station about the decree and was advised not to trouble Respondent No.6. It is further submitted that the Petitioner never appeared at the police station and Respondent No.3 has not interfered or acted high-handedly in the civil dispute pending between the Petitioner and Respondent No.6. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the Respondent Nos.3 & 5 not to interfere further in the civil dispute in view of the pendency of the civil suit between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.6. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 23.02.2026 PRA 4 22 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3524 of 2026 Date: 23.02.2026 PRA