Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16411 (PNJ)

GAGANDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/39038/2025 · 2026-04-21

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

285 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAGANDEEP SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rituraj Singh, DAG, Punjab. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 21.04.2026 himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH GAGANDEEP SINGH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rituraj Singh, DAG, Punjab. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be sed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-39038-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 21.04.2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for the petitioner. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be HIMANSHU 2026.04.22 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document