Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16410 (MAD)

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Gajendramurthy Rangappa

TCA/29/2026 · 2026-03-18

G Arul Murugan

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

T.C.A.No.29 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.03.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN T.C.A.No.29 of 2026 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Coimbatore. Appellant Vs Gajendramurthy Rangappa D.No.3/207/A-T, Avalapall, Hosur – 635 109. Respondent PRAYER : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “A SMC” Bench, Chennai, dated 9.9.2025 in ITA No.1583/Chny/2025. For Appellant: Mr.V.Mahalingam Sr. Standing Counsel JUDGMENT (Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the appellant states that the monetary limit involved in this appeal is below the monetary limit prescribed in ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.No.29 of 2026 Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India. Learned counsel says that he has instructions to withdraw the appeal. 2. Learned counsel also states that the withdrawal is only due to the monetary limit and without conceding the stand of the Department. 3. The tax case appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 18.03.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr To: 1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Benches, Chennai. 2. The Prl. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Coimbatore. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.No.29 of 2026 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. bbr T.C.A.No.29 of 2026 18.03.2026 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis