Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16410 (AP)

GAMPALA CHINA BABU v. H.Y.DORA

CC/207/2018 · 2026-03-01

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010060302018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 207/2018 Between: 1. GAMPALA CHINA BABU, OCC-LINE INSPECTOR, APEPDCL, R/O.RAMPACHODAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. GUDALA RAJABABU, OCC- LINE INSPECTOR, APEPDCL, R/O. PRATHIPADU, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. H Y DORA, CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, P AND T COLONY, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM-13. 2. SRI K V S PRASAD, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER,OPERATION, APEPDC LIMITED , RAJAHMUNDRY - 533101, E.G.DISTRICT. 3. SRI S RAMANA MURTHY, DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, OPERATION, APEPDC LIMITED, JAGAMPETA - 533435, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents/ Contemnors for their wilful disobedience of the Order of this Hon'ble Court made in I.A.No.1 of 2017 in 2 W.P.No.45134 of 2017 dated 29-12-2017 in terms of sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. B S SHIVAJI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 207/2018 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the Order dated 29.12.2017 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2017 in W.P.No.45134 of 2017. 2. When the matter was taken up, Mr.B.S.Shivaji, learned counsel for the petitioners, fairly submits that the main writ petition was dismissed as infructuous on 31.12.2025. In view of the disposal of the main writ petition, the petitioners are not inclined to pursue the present contempt proceedings against the respondents. 3. Accordingly, recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 02.03.2026 S D P 4 115 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 207/2018 02.03.2026 W S D P