Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16408 (RAJ)

LOVE KUMAR S/O LATE DINESH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1628/2026 · 2026-01-29

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4068] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1628/2026 Love Kumar S/o Late Dinesh, age 23 Years, R/o Kantwari, Police Station Dholagarh Devi (Bahutkalan), District Alwar. (At present in District Jail, Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajendra Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 29/01/2026 1. This bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.157/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali (Dausa), District Dausa for offence punishable under Section 408 of the IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that a civil dispute has been given colour of criminal offence. Counsel submits that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate and charge-sheet has been filed in this case. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.12.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2026:RJ-JP:4068] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1628/2026] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate, as also the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, so also the fact that charge-sheet has been filed in this case and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Love Kumar S/o Late Dinesh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /149